The science-policy interface in policy theories: A comparative case study of street level policing for illicit drugs

image - Policy Square 0
Date Commenced:
03/2014
Expected Date of Completion:
2016
Project Supporters:

Australian Research Council - Discovery Project DP140100219

Project Members: 
image - 1313976712 Alison Ritter 005
Director, Drug Policy Modelling Program
Ph 02 9385 0236
image - Caitlin Hughes Square
Senior Lecturer
Ph 02 9385 0132
image - Kari Lancaster Low Res 2017
Scientia Fellow
Ph 02 9385 0476
Project Main Description: 

This study will shed light on how policy gets formed by police, and what influences the policy formulation process. Two policy case studies: drug detection dogs and police attendance at drug overdose, will be used to test two very prominent policy process theories: Kingdon’s Multiple Streams and Sabatier’s Advocacy Coalition Framework. Examination of these policy process theories in the context of policing of illicit drugs has the potential to provide significant new insights about the interface of science and policy, such that more effective drug policies become possible.

Project Collaborators: External: 

Professor Robert Hoppe
University of Twente, Netherlands

Aims: 
Through a comparative case study approach, this project will:
  1. assess the scientific merit of the two competing policy process theories (across the two case studies); 
  2. examine their applicability to the unique policing context; and 
  3. study the ways in which each theory can account for the interface between science and policy. 
 
Design and Method: 
Documents describing the events and activities around the policy developments for the two case studies will be reviewed. Interviews will be conducted with experts who were involved in the two case studies. From the documentary review and expert interviews, we will develop a narrative that conforms to each of the two policy theories. These narratives (one for Kingdon’s Multiple Streams and one for Sabatier’s Advocacy Coalition framework) will then be analysed for congruence, explanatory power, and face validity with police, and the relationship between science and policy teased out.
 
Progress/Update: 

This project is nearing completion, pending final publications to arise.

Output: 

Publications:

 

  1. Lancaster, K., Ritter, A., Hughes, C., & Hoppe, R. (in press). A critical examination of the introduction of drug detection dogs for policing of illicit drugs in New South Wales, Australia using Kingdon’s ‘multiple streams’ heuristic. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice (Advance online publication), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/174426416X14683497019265.
  2. Lancaster, K., Hughes, C., & Ritter, A. (2016) “Drug dogs unleashed”: An historical and political account of drug detection dogs for street-level policing of illicit drugs in New South Wales, Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology (Advance online publication), DOI: 10.1177/0004865816642826.
  3. Ritter, A., & Lancaster K. (forthcoming). Chapter 22: Kingdon’s multiple streams: a review. In Handbook of the Policy process. London: Edward Elgar
  4. Ritter, A., & Lancaster, K. (2013) Illicit drugs, policing and the evidence-based policy paradigm, Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 9(4), 457-472.

 

Presentations and policy submissions:

  1. Lancaster, K. (2016, August) Drug dogs unleashed: policy processes, politics and ‘evidence-based drug policy’. Invited guest lecture at the School of Social Sciences, UNSW, 8 August, Sydney.
  2. Lancaster, K. (2016, April) Examining the introduction of drug detection dogs for street-level policing of drugs in NSW. Invited guest lecture at the School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW, 18 April, Sydney.
  3. Lancaster, K., Ritter, A., Hughes, C. & Hoppe, R. (2015, November) ‘An idea whose time has come?’ Examining the introduction of drug detection dogs for street-level policing of drugs in NSW. Paper presented at the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre Seminar Series, 12 November, Sydney.
  4. Lancaster, K. Delegate at the Sydney Drug Law Reform Roundtable, hosted by David Shoebridge (NSW Greens), 16 February 2016
  5. Ritter, A. What keeps me up at night – illicit drug policy. Unsomnia @ UNSW, 1st December, 2016
  6. Ritter, A. Facilitator NSW Harm Minimisation Summit, August, 2016
Benefits: 
This project will create new knowledge in relation to:
  • The scientific merit of two competing policy theoretical frameworks, and contribute amendments and improvements to the theories;
  • New insights into how well such theories apply to street-level policing
  • Comprehensive timelines and a narrative description of two case studies – of use to police and policy researchers 
  • Better understanding of the dynamic relationship between science and policy 
 
Project Research Area: 
Project Status: 
Current