The funding and delivery of homelessness services: a case study evidence

image - Homeless Square 0
Date Commenced:
05/2015
Expected Date of Completion:
12/2016
Project Supporters:

Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute

Project Members: 
image - 1354256378 Liz Whittaker Square
Ms Elizabeth Whittaker
Research Officer
Project Main Description: 

This study provides evidence on the mix of government and non-government direct and indirect funding in the homelessness service system and across mainstream services and enterprises supporting the homeless and examines how the funding of homelessness services influences service provision and outcomes for homeless people.

Project Collaborators: External: 

Prof Paul Flatau
University of Western Australia

A/Prof David McKenzie
Swinburne University of Technology

Dr Angela Spinney
Swinburne University of Technology

Dr Kylie Valentine
Social Research Policy Centre UNSW

A/Prof Daphne Habibis
The University of Tasmania

Dr Kaylene Zaretzky
University of Western Australia

Alicia Bauskis
University of Western Australia

Dr Andrea Sharam
Swinburne University of Technology

Prof Adam Steen
Swinburne University of Technology

Dr Sean McNelis
Swinburne University of Technology

Aims: 

Australia’s services supporting homeless people are provided principally by non-government organisations. The evidence from the work of Flatau and Zaretzky (AHURI projects 80306 and 82014) is that specialist homelessness services are funded largely by government (including both homelessness specific and mainstream funding sources), but that they also rely on other funding sources including own-revenue sources such as rental income. And, while it is a relatively easy matter to add up all Australian Government and State/Territory recurrent funding of specialist homelessness services, it is much more difficult to estimate the level of government capital funding, the government funding of complementary mainstream services and the role played by philanthropic funding and organizational reserves in funding services for the homeless.

There are also new developments in the funding of homelessness services that are of significant policy interest. For example, internationally, we have seen the introduction of the use of social impact bonds to fund homelessness services through a payment by results mechanism and private investor sources (e.g., the £5 million London Rough Sleeping Social Impact Bond program which began in 2012). Both in Australia and elsewhere we have also seen social enterprises spring up whose prime social mission is supporting homeless people to gain employment and develop their own businesses.

The aims of this Inquiry are to:

  1. Fill the significant gap in our knowledge base on the mix of funding for homelessness service delivery;
  2. Understand the important linkages that exist between funding sources, service delivery and outcomes for homeless people; and,
  3. Develop policy options and a framework for the funding of homelessness services in Australia.
Design and Method: 

The Inquiry will be conducted in three stages:

  • Stage 1: The development of the Inquiry Framework: The Inquiry Panel and Inquiry Paper
  • Stage 2: The conduct of three integrated Research Projects incorporating a national focus group process
  • Stage 3: The Inquiry Assessment of the Evidence from the Research Projects and delivery of a Final Inquiry Report.
Progress/Update: 

Data collection is now in progress. The first of three reports has been released and can be accessed here: http://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/research-in-progress/inquiry-82090

 

 

Project Research Area: 
Project Status: 
Current